|
|
|
| blog topics links porno |
Seymour Butts / Adam Glasser
FAMILY BUSINESS ON SHOWTIME
OBSCENITY CASE In 2001, Los Angeles county prosecutors filed obscenity charges against Glasser over a lesbian anal fisting scene in his video Tampa Tushy Fest. Prosecutors eventually backed down before the case could go to trial, and Glasser pled to greatly reduced charges.
This passage from the legal journal article caught my attention: Officials from the LAPD raided Glasser's offices in December 2000, after the city attorney's office received an anonymous complaint about the European version of the video "Tampa Tushy Fest Part I." The scene depicted a sexual act known as "fisting." Under the terms of his plea, Glasser agreed to warn customers that there were two versions of film. Does this mean that the fisting scene in question didn't even appear in the US release version of Tampa Tushy Fest Part I? Did the LA prosecutors, frustrated by the weak obscenity case, become consumer advocates for cheated domestic fisting fans? Adult Video News reported on Glasser's preparations for the trial: "He had amassed a great quantity of evidence in his defense, including videotapes, magazines and sex toys that dealt directly with the subject of 'fisting,' which was depicted in the Glasser-directed tape, Tampa Tushy Fest, for which Glasser was prosecuted. Glasser also had several expert witnesses lined up to testify in his behalf before the settlement was reached." AVN printed responses to the settlement from other porno producers here, here and here, including responses from other producers currently facing obscenity charges. (That last link includes a bizarre statement by Max Hardcore evoking September 11, Afghanistan and Guantanamo Bay.)
I have been told that the list, that 1981 memorandum, is being reviewed very seriously by [L.A. City Attorney] Mr. Delgadillo and his staff. I believe that they want to put their regime's own stamp on how the city handles these obscenity cases. They want to re-create the guidelines, so to speak, and from what I hear, fisting is one of the acts that is going to be reviewed because of its touch on every group of sexually active people: heterosexuals, lesbian women and gay men. That act is pervasive among all three, and I think with all the information we provided to them, I think they became suddenly aware -- I don't think they knew there were books written on fisting, and that so many web sites had information available on fisting. I don't think they were aware of what's happened in this world, sexually, since 1981. Good news for fisting fans. Guess Debra won't have to make these buttons after all. A while back, Daze linked to an LA legal journal article about the settlement reprinted at Pursed Lips. I noted this ambiguous passage in the article: "Officials from the LAPD raided Glasser's offices in December 2000, after the city attorney's office received an anonymous complaint about the European version of the video Tampa Tushy Fest Part I. The scene depicted a sexual act known as 'fisting.' Under the terms of his plea, Glasser agreed to warn customers that there were two versions of film." Susannah Breslin informs me that the fisting scene did indeed appear in the US release version. Blue's article clears this up somewhat: "Glasser agreed to make all customers of Tampa Tushy Fest aware that a 'non-fisting' version of the tape exists if they wish to purchase it, or exchange a currently owned 'fisting' version for it. Otherwise, Glasser is free to sell the fisting version of Tushy Fest in California, safe from any charge of obscenity." OK, that explains the "two versions," but I still don't get the reference to "the European version." |
|